Multi-output machine-learning benchmark and Pareto-based decision support for electron-beam welding of thin-walled titanium structures with comparative synthetic-data augmentation

Citation

Tynchenko, Valeriya V. and Kurashkin, Sergei O. and Bukhtoyarov, Vladimir V. and Connie, Tee and Borodulin, Aleksei S. and Mikhailov, Artem. Y. and Tynchenko, Vadim S. (2026) Multi-output machine-learning benchmark and Pareto-based decision support for electron-beam welding of thin-walled titanium structures with comparative synthetic-data augmentation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. ISSN 0268-3768

[img] Text
s00170-026-18892-y.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (4MB)

Abstract

Electron-beam welding (EBW) of thin-walled titanium components is a key joining technology for aerospace and highvacuum applications, in which reliable data-driven prediction of weld-bead geometry from controllable process parameters underpins shop-floor decision support. Existing studies are nevertheless constrained by small experimental data sets, narrow algorithmic coverage, ad-hoc hyperparameter tuning, scalar evaluation criteria and the absence of a formal statistical comparison framework. The present work proposes a unified methodology that addresses these gaps through (i) a comparative evaluation of four synthetic-data generators—conditional tabular GAN, tabular variational autoencoder, Gaussian copula, and a physics-informed generator based on the moving-source thermal solution—with a convergence study from 1 000 to 50 000 samples and a five-mode ablation protocol (real-only, synth-only, real+synth, train-on-synthetic–test-onreal, train-on-real–test-on-real); (ii) a 41-model multi-output regression benchmark spanning generalised linear, kernel, ensemble, gradient-boosting and tabular deep-learning families; (iii) a 12-method hyperparameter optimisation comparison that includes three genetic-algorithm variants and the multi-objective NSGA-II; (iv) a 15-metric evaluation panel reported with bootstrap confidence intervals; (v) Friedman–Nemenyi and Wilcoxon signed-rank statistical comparison; (vi) Paretobased inverse parameter design for joint depth-and-width targeting; and (vii) global and local interpretability through SHAP, partial-dependence and accumulated-local-effects analyses. On the real ablation a Friedman test rejects equality of the 41 regressors (χ2 = 439.0, p =1.3 × 10−68); the ten best models lie within 0.013 macro-R2 of one another (NGBoost leading at 0.936), and only NGBoost and the mixture density network are Pareto-optimal in the joint (RMSED, RMSEW ) sense. Among synthetic generators, TVAE, the Gaussian copula and the physics-informed generator all yield usable downstream models (median macro-R2 of 0.85, 0.74 and 0.81), whereas CTGAN trained on synthetic data alone falls below a constant predictor at N = 72. The NSGA-II inverse design recovers admissible process windows for prescribed depthand-width targets within the observed envelope, and additionally maps the achievable depth–width capability frontier. The framework is released as open-source code with a Zenodo-archived release, supporting reproducibility and providing a methodological template for other small-data manufacturing-process problems

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Synthetic-data augmentation, Pareto-based decision support, Machine learning
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA71-90 Instruments and machines > QA75.5-76.95 Electronic computers. Computer science
Divisions: Faculty of Information Science and Technology (FIST)
Depositing User: Ms Rosnani Abd Wahab
Date Deposited: 04 Sep 2026 06:37
Last Modified: 04 Sep 2026 06:37
URII: http://shdl.mmu.edu.my/id/eprint/16724

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View ItemEdit (login required)